
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1744038
The demand on data custodians to disclose health information for secondary purposes is increasing dramatically. These demands come from researchers, public health professionals, commercial actors, and governments. In many jurisdictions, de-identification is one set of methods that can be used to allow the use and disclosure of health information without consent. This report describes the reasons why it is desirable or necessary to de-identify health data before disclosing or using it for secondary purposes. The scenarios we consider reflect the most common conditions under which a custodian would want to de-identify the data. These include an assessment of alternatives, such as consent, on-site access, and remote access to data, the impacts of data breaches and breach notification, unplanned and unexpected uses of data by the public and private sectors, and public perception and trust.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
