
handle: 10419/46237 , 10419/264762
Financial institutions are increasingly linked internationally. As a result, financial crises and government intervention have stronger effects beyond borders. We provide a model of international contagion allowing for bank bailouts. While a social planner trades off tax distortions, liquidation losses, and intra- and intercountry income inequality, in the noncooperative game between governments there are inefficiencies due to externalities, a lack of burden sharing, and free riding. We show that, in absence of cooperation, stronger interbank linkages make government interests diverge, whereas cross-border asset holdings tend to align them. We analyze different forms of cooperation and their effects on global and national welfare. (JEL C72, G01, G21, G28)
G28, Finanzmarktkrise, Bankenkrise, Internationale wirtschaftspolitische Koordination, international institutional arrangements, ddc:330, F36, financial crisis, bailout, contagion, financial crisis, international institutional arrangements, Ansteckungseffekt, contagion, bailout, Portfolio choice, international transmission of shocks, monetary policy, Schuldenübernahme, G01, F42, jel: jel:F42, jel: jel:F41, jel: jel:G01, jel: jel:G21, jel: jel:G28, jel: jel:C72, jel: jel:F31, jel: jel:F36
G28, Finanzmarktkrise, Bankenkrise, Internationale wirtschaftspolitische Koordination, international institutional arrangements, ddc:330, F36, financial crisis, bailout, contagion, financial crisis, international institutional arrangements, Ansteckungseffekt, contagion, bailout, Portfolio choice, international transmission of shocks, monetary policy, Schuldenübernahme, G01, F42, jel: jel:F42, jel: jel:F41, jel: jel:G01, jel: jel:G21, jel: jel:G28, jel: jel:C72, jel: jel:F31, jel: jel:F36
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
