
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1729085
handle: 10419/231219 , 10419/53692
In this paper, the authors use the iPhone as a case to show that even high-tech products invented by United States (US) companies will not increase US exports, but on the contrary exacerbate the US trade deficit. The iPhone contributed US$1.8 billion to the US trade deficit with the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Unprecedented globalization, well organized global production networks, repaid development of cross-country production fragmentation, and low transportation costs all contributed to rational firms such as Apple making business decisions that contributed directly to the US trade deficit reduction. Global production networks and highly specialized production processes apparently reverse trade patterns: developing countries such as the PRC export high-tech goods - like the iPhone - while industrialized countries such as the US import the high-tech goods they themselves invented. In addition, conventional trade statistics greatly inflate bilateral trade deficits between a country used as export-platform by multinational firms and its destination countries.
China, Internationale Arbeitsteilung, ddc:330, Elektronisches Produkt, Trade Deficit, The United States and the PRC, iPhone, global production networks, Unprecedented globalization, Renminbi, Aufwertung, F1, iPhone, sino-us trade; apple iphone; world trade patterns, Außenhandel, US Trade deficit, Sino-American trade deficit, transportation, specialized production processes, Zahlungsbilanzungleichgewicht, Außenhandelseffekt, USA, jel: jel:F10, jel: jel:F1
China, Internationale Arbeitsteilung, ddc:330, Elektronisches Produkt, Trade Deficit, The United States and the PRC, iPhone, global production networks, Unprecedented globalization, Renminbi, Aufwertung, F1, iPhone, sino-us trade; apple iphone; world trade patterns, Außenhandel, US Trade deficit, Sino-American trade deficit, transportation, specialized production processes, Zahlungsbilanzungleichgewicht, Außenhandelseffekt, USA, jel: jel:F10, jel: jel:F1
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 80 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
