
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1728125
This paper provides a basic framework that explains how the major types of known digital money solutions relate to each other, i.e. what are the similarities and differences, and hence the pros and cons, of each. The broader purpose is to offer fresh new perspectives on how digital money grids might be pieced together in the future, so as to make them: (i) safer, technologically and operationally; (ii) more convenient, user friendly, and useful by making them easier to integrate into broader digital solutions (i.e. more programmable); (iii) more contestable by different providers, creating more of a level playing field and stronger incentives to innovate; and (iv) much cheaper than current systems, especially for micro-transactions, which to this day remain unsupported by efficient payment mechanisms and yet constitute the vast majority of transactions in the mass market.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
