Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Turkish Investors’ Foreign Portfolio Investments

Authors: Erkin Diyarbakirlioglu;

Turkish Investors’ Foreign Portfolio Investments

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to examine Turkish investors’ foreign asset holdings from the perspective of both the “international portfolio diversification” and the “home bias” literature using asset holdings data from the IMF’s “Coordinated Portfolio Investment Survey” (CPIS). For years, the scope of the related empirical literature had been bounded with limited data availability since the estimation of cross-border investment positions using flows data would be misleading (see Warnock F., 2002, Home Bias and High Turnover Reconsidered, Journal of International Money and Finance). Despite some shortcomings, the CPIS data files present a reliable perspective to evaluate countries’ portfolio positions. As a rule of thumb, the more home-biased are local investors in a country, the less they are likely to benefit from the international diversification gains. Indeed, since the mid-1980s, the investment environment in Turkey had been gradually liberalized. Given this facilitated access to global capital markets, local investors transacting solely within the domestic market should also exploit the presumed gains from international diversification. Thus, I propose a comparative analysis of Turkish investors’ aggregate external positions along with a number of developed and emerging economies to reveal out the extent to which local investors in Turkey overlook (or consider) portfolio investment alternatives abroad compared to their counterparts in other countries. The analysis show that Turkish investors are particularly home-biased compared to other investors in OECD countries. Yet, a simple international mean-variance model suggests that the optimal domestic portfolio share ranges between 10 to 30% for reasonable degrees of risk aversion puzzle.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!