
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1666693
In 2010, Australia introduced the Australian Consumer Law by its Trade Practices Amendment (Australian Consumer Law) Act (No. 2). The standard of consumer protection in the provision of financial services is considered in relation to this new legislation and also the further Australian federal legislation: the Australian Securities and Investment Commission Act and the Corporations Act. It is then compared with the consumer protection standards of the common law. The new standards are further tested, firstly, against a new 'product' advertised by the Bendigo Bank in 2010, called the Homesafe Debt Free Equity Release, and secondly, against reform proposals which would prohibit the receipt of commissions by financial service providers. The new Bendigo Bank 'product' raises new implications for the finance industry and for consumer protection. The question is posed: is the ultimate consumer protection in the finance industry a duty of care, owed by the profession of financial services providers, to produce optimum wealth for Australians through a sound and reliable financial system for the consumer?
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
