
We show that log-periodic power-law (LPPL) functions are intrinsically very hard to fit to time series. This comes from their sloppiness, the squared residuals depending very much on some combinations of parameters and very little on other ones. The time of singularity that is supposed to give an estimate of the day of the crash belongs to the latter category. We discuss in detail why and how the fitting procedure must take into account the sloppy nature of this kind of model. We then test the reliability of LPPLs on synthetic AR(1) data replicating the Hang Seng 1987 crash and show that even this case is borderline regarding predictability of divergence time. We finally argue that current methods used to estimate a probabilistic time window for the divergence time are likely to be over-optimistic.
6 pages, 5 figures
Physics - Physics and Society, Statistical Finance (q-fin.ST), info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33, Quantitative Finance - Statistical Finance, FOS: Physical sciences, Financial time series, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Mathematical finance, Power laws, FOS: Economics and business, Modelling asset price dynamics, Quantitative Finance - General Finance, General Finance (q-fin.GN)
Physics - Physics and Society, Statistical Finance (q-fin.ST), info:eu-repo/classification/udc/33, Quantitative Finance - Statistical Finance, FOS: Physical sciences, Financial time series, Physics and Society (physics.soc-ph), Mathematical finance, Power laws, FOS: Economics and business, Modelling asset price dynamics, Quantitative Finance - General Finance, General Finance (q-fin.GN)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 39 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
