
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1596030
The relationship between trade liberalization and informal activity has not received the attention, whether theoretical or empirical, that it may deserve. The conventional view posits that trade liberalization would cause a rise in informality. This paper uses three different data sets to assess the sign of the relationship. Empirical results provide a mixed picture. Macro-founded data tend to produce results supporting the conventional view; micro-founded data do not. Empirical results also suggest that while informal output increases with deeper trade liberalization, informal employment falls.
Informal Sector, Trade Liberalisation, Cross-sectional Analysis, Time Series Analysis, Panel Analysis, jel: jel:F16, jel: jel:O17, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:F13
Informal Sector, Trade Liberalisation, Cross-sectional Analysis, Time Series Analysis, Panel Analysis, jel: jel:F16, jel: jel:O17, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:F13
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 24 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
