
We study the empirical determinants of China’s capital flight. In addition to the covered interest differential, our empirical exercise includes a rather exhaustive list of macroeconomic variables and a few institutional factors. Overall, our regression exercise shows that China’s capital flight is quite well explained by its own history and covered interest differentials. The other possible determinants offer relatively small additional explanatory power. It is also found that China’s capital flight responds differently to the components of covered interest differentials and to the positive and negative components of these variables. The response pattern, however, depends on the choice of data frequency. The general impression is that the monthly results are more intuitive than the quarterly ones.
macro determinants, China, covered interest differential, Covered Interest Differential, Forward Premium, Expected Depreciation, Asymmetric Response, Macro Determinants, ddc:330, G15, forward premium, expected depreciation, Kapitalflucht, Devisentermingeschäft, Erwartungstheorie, F32, covered interest differential, forward premium, expected depreciation, asymmetric response, macro determinants, Zinsparität, F30, Makroökonomischer Einfluss, asymmetric response, jel: jel:F32, jel: jel:F30, jel: jel:G15, jel: jel:F3
macro determinants, China, covered interest differential, Covered Interest Differential, Forward Premium, Expected Depreciation, Asymmetric Response, Macro Determinants, ddc:330, G15, forward premium, expected depreciation, Kapitalflucht, Devisentermingeschäft, Erwartungstheorie, F32, covered interest differential, forward premium, expected depreciation, asymmetric response, macro determinants, Zinsparität, F30, Makroökonomischer Einfluss, asymmetric response, jel: jel:F32, jel: jel:F30, jel: jel:G15, jel: jel:F3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 28 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
