
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1545130
handle: 10419/150817 , 10419/36251
Using self reported measures of life satisfaction and risk attitudes, we empirically test whether there is a relationship between individuals inequality and risk aversion. The empirical analysis uses the German SOEP household panel for the years 1997 to 2007 to conclude that the negative effect of inequality measured by the sample gini coefficient by year and federal state is larger for those individuals who report to be less willing to take risks. Nevertheless, the empirical results suggest that even though inequality and risk aversion are related, they are not the same thing. The paper shows that the relationship between risk attitudes and inequality aversion survives the inclusion of individual characteristics (i.e. income, education, and gender) that may be correlated with both risk attitudes and inequality aversion.
Happiness, inequality aversion, risk attitudes, well-being, Inequality aversion, Happiness, Well-being, Risc, happiness, inequality aversion, risk attitudes, well-being, well-being, I31, Risk attitudes, Deutschland, Soziale Ungleichheit, ddc:330, Zufriedenheit, Risikopräferenz, Lebenszufriedenheit, Risc Models matemàtics, risk attitudes, inequality aversion, Igualtat, D63, D3, Igualtat Models matemàtics, Schätzung, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:I31, jel: jel:D3
Happiness, inequality aversion, risk attitudes, well-being, Inequality aversion, Happiness, Well-being, Risc, happiness, inequality aversion, risk attitudes, well-being, well-being, I31, Risk attitudes, Deutschland, Soziale Ungleichheit, ddc:330, Zufriedenheit, Risikopräferenz, Lebenszufriedenheit, Risc Models matemàtics, risk attitudes, inequality aversion, Igualtat, D63, D3, Igualtat Models matemàtics, Schätzung, jel: jel:D63, jel: jel:I31, jel: jel:D3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
