
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1542937
handle: 10419/150148 , 1807/27177
Preferences may arise from regret, i.e., from comparisons with alternatives forgone by the decision maker. We ask whether regret-based behavior is consistent with non-expected utility theories of transitive choice and show that the answer is no. If choices are governed by ex ante regret and rejoicing then non-expected utility preferences must be intransitive.
D81, Regret, ddc:330, Regret, transitivity, non-expected utility, non-expected utility, transitivity, regret, expected utility, transitivity, jel: jel:D81, jel: jel:D03
D81, Regret, ddc:330, Regret, transitivity, non-expected utility, non-expected utility, transitivity, regret, expected utility, transitivity, jel: jel:D81, jel: jel:D03
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
