Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Cost-Effectiveness of High- and Low-Osmolality Contrast Media in Patients with High Risk of Contrast Induced Nephropathy

Authors: Oscar Gamboa; Liliana Chicaíza; Mario García Molina;

Cost-Effectiveness of High- and Low-Osmolality Contrast Media in Patients with High Risk of Contrast Induced Nephropathy

Abstract

Contrast media induced nephropathy is a common cause of kidney failure in hospitalized patients. It has been suggested that high-osmolality contrast media caused less nephropathies than low-osmolality ones. The cost-effectiveness of High- (Iodixanol) and Low-osmolality (Iohexol, Iopamidol and others) contrast media are compared by means of a decision tree. The analysis showed that Iopamidol and Iodixanol strategies dominated all the others. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Iodixanol compared to Iopamidol is $31.637.306 per adicional avoided nephropathy. Iodixanol strategy is cost-effective for a budget per patient higher than $980.000, or 50 ml vial cost lower than $57.000, or willingness to pay per nephropathy avoided higher than $32.000.000.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!