
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1464773
handle: 10419/91795 , 10419/119490 , 10419/29765
With banking sectors worldwide still suffering from the effects of the financial crisis, public discussion of plans to place toxic assets in one or more bad banks has gained steam in recent weeks. The following paper presents a plan how governments can efficiently relieve ailing banks from toxic assets by transferring these assets into a publicly sponsored work-out unit, a so-called bad bank. The key element of the plan is the valuation of troubled assets at their current market value - assets with no market would thus be valued at zero. The current shareholders will cover the losses arising from the depreciation reserve in the amount of the difference of the toxic assets' current book value and their market value. Under the plan, the government would bear responsibility for the management and future resale of toxic assets at its own cost and recapitalize the good bank by taking an equity stake in it. In extreme cases, this would mean a takeover of the bank by the government. The risk to taxpayers from this investment would be acceptable, however, once the banks are freed from toxic assets. A clear emphasis that the government stake is temporary would also be necessary. The government would cover the bad bank's losses, while profits would be distributed to the distressed bank's current shareholders. The plan is viable independent of whether the government decides to have one centralized bad bank or to establish a separate bad bank for each systemically relevant banking institute. Under the terms of the plan, bad banks and nationalization are not alternatives but rather two sides of the same coin. This plan effectively addresses three key challenges. It provides for the transparent removal of toxic assets and gives the banks a fresh start. At the same time, it offers the chance to keep the cost to taxpayers low. In addition, the risk of moral hazard is curtailed. The comparison of the proposed design with the bad bank plan of the German government reveals some shortcomings of the latter plan that may threaten the achievement of these key issues.
Toxic Assets, G28, Financial Regulation, Bad Bank, Finanzmarktkrise, G24, Financial crisis, financial crisis, financial regulation, toxic assets, bad bank, Wirkungsanalyse, Bankenkrise, Spezialbank, Kreditrisiko, Bankenpolitik, Deutschland, Bankinsolvenz, Bankenregulierung, Unternehmenssanierung, Financial crisis, financial regulation, toxic assets, Bad Bank, ddc:330, financial crisis, Bad Bank; Financial crisis; Financial Regulation; Toxic Assets, Finanzkrise, Financial crisis, Financial Regulation, Toxic Assets, Bad Bank, toxic assets, bad bank, G20, financial regulation, jel: jel:G20, jel: jel:G24, jel: jel:G28, ddc: ddc:330
Toxic Assets, G28, Financial Regulation, Bad Bank, Finanzmarktkrise, G24, Financial crisis, financial crisis, financial regulation, toxic assets, bad bank, Wirkungsanalyse, Bankenkrise, Spezialbank, Kreditrisiko, Bankenpolitik, Deutschland, Bankinsolvenz, Bankenregulierung, Unternehmenssanierung, Financial crisis, financial regulation, toxic assets, Bad Bank, ddc:330, financial crisis, Bad Bank; Financial crisis; Financial Regulation; Toxic Assets, Finanzkrise, Financial crisis, Financial Regulation, Toxic Assets, Bad Bank, toxic assets, bad bank, G20, financial regulation, jel: jel:G20, jel: jel:G24, jel: jel:G28, ddc: ddc:330
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
