
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1443793
handle: 10419/53194 , 10419/43760
Since the seminal contribution of Jackson & Wolinsky 1996 [A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks, JET 71, 44-74] it has been widely acknowledged that the formation of social networks exhibits a general conflict between individual strategic behavior and collective outcome. What has not been studied systematically are the sources of inefficiency. We approach this gap by analyzing the role of positive and negative externalities of link formation. We find general results that relate situations of positive externalities with stable networks that cannot be "too dense" in a well-defined sense, while situations with negative externalities, tend to induce "too dense" networks.
Spieltheorie, 330, Network Formation, Efficiency, Spillovers, C72, Game Theory, Efficiency, Externalities, Spillovers, Game theory, Connections, Stability, Network formation, Networks, Network formation, Network Externalities, Game theory, L14, ddc:330, Connections, Soziales Netzwerk, Externalities, Networks, D85, Networks, Network Formation, Connections, Game Theory, Externalities, Spillovers, Stability, Efficiency, Stability, Theorie, jel: jel:D85, jel: jel:C72, jel: jel:L14
Spieltheorie, 330, Network Formation, Efficiency, Spillovers, C72, Game Theory, Efficiency, Externalities, Spillovers, Game theory, Connections, Stability, Network formation, Networks, Network formation, Network Externalities, Game theory, L14, ddc:330, Connections, Soziales Netzwerk, Externalities, Networks, D85, Networks, Network Formation, Connections, Game Theory, Externalities, Spillovers, Stability, Efficiency, Stability, Theorie, jel: jel:D85, jel: jel:C72, jel: jel:L14
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
