<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
handle: 10419/35866 , 1885/28257
In almost all European Union countries, the gender wage gap is increasing across the wages distribution. In this lecture I briefly survey some recent studies aiming to explain why apparently identical women and men receive such different returns and focus especially on those incorporating pyschological factors as an explanation of the gender gap. Research areas with high potential returns to further analysis are identified. Several examples from my own recent experimental work with Patrick Nolen are also presented. These try to distinguish between the role of nature and nurture in affecting behavioural differences between men and women that might lead to gender wage gaps.
Test, 330, Keywords: Experimental economics, Lohndifferenzierung, Frauenerwerbstätigkeit, C9, experimental economics, J71, HB Economic Theory, personality differences, experimental economics, glass ceiling, experimental economics; glass ceiling; personality differences, J16, ddc:330, personality differences, Persönlichkeitspsychologie, Arbeitsmarktdiskriminierung, EU-Staaten, Personality differences, glass ceiling, experimental economics, personality differences, behaviour, Glass ceiling, jel: jel:C9, jel: jel:J71, jel: jel:J16
Test, 330, Keywords: Experimental economics, Lohndifferenzierung, Frauenerwerbstätigkeit, C9, experimental economics, J71, HB Economic Theory, personality differences, experimental economics, glass ceiling, experimental economics; glass ceiling; personality differences, J16, ddc:330, personality differences, Persönlichkeitspsychologie, Arbeitsmarktdiskriminierung, EU-Staaten, Personality differences, glass ceiling, experimental economics, personality differences, behaviour, Glass ceiling, jel: jel:C9, jel: jel:J71, jel: jel:J16
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 68 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |