
Negative perceptions about migrants in Europe are driven by concerns that foreigners abuse welfare. Paradoxically, instruments of social inclusion are becoming weapons of mass exclusion. We compare evidence on welfare access and the net fiscal position of migrants with perceptions based on a largely unexploited database (EU‐SILC). We find no evidence that legal migrants, notably skilled migrants, are net recipients of transfers from the state. However, there is evidence of ‘residual dependency’ on non‐contributory transfers and self‐selection of unskilled migrants in the countries with the most generous welfare states. Alternative strategies to unbundle migration from welfare access are discussed.
welfare access, Sozialtransfer, immigration policy; welfare state; fiscal policy, Migration policy, Welfare access, Fiscal externality, Migration policy; Welfare access; Fiscal externality, Migrationspolitik, Sozialpolitik, Internationale Wanderung, Ethnische Diskriminierung, migration policy; welfare access; fiscal externality, Migration policy, fiscal externality, Verteilungspolitik, J38, ddc:330, Welfare access, Sozialstaat, Soziale Integration, J5, EU-Staaten, Migranten, migration policy, welfare access, fiscal externality, Fiscal externality, jel: jel:J5, jel: jel:J38
welfare access, Sozialtransfer, immigration policy; welfare state; fiscal policy, Migration policy, Welfare access, Fiscal externality, Migration policy; Welfare access; Fiscal externality, Migrationspolitik, Sozialpolitik, Internationale Wanderung, Ethnische Diskriminierung, migration policy; welfare access; fiscal externality, Migration policy, fiscal externality, Verteilungspolitik, J38, ddc:330, Welfare access, Sozialstaat, Soziale Integration, J5, EU-Staaten, Migranten, migration policy, welfare access, fiscal externality, Fiscal externality, jel: jel:J5, jel: jel:J38
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 155 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
