
AbstractWhen price dispersion is prevalent, a relevant question is what happens to the whole distribution of equilibrium prices when the number of firms changes. Using data from the gasoline market in the Netherlands, we find, first, that markets with N competitors have price distributions that first‐order stochastically dominate the price distributions in markets with N+1 firms. Second, the effect of competition is stronger for the medium to upper percentiles of the price distribution. Finally, consumer gains from competition are larger for relatively well‐informed consumers. To account for these empirical patterns, we extend Varian's [1980] model by allowing for richer heterogeneity in consumer price information.
Preiswettbewerb, SELLERS, gasoline prices, Preis, RETAIL GASOLINE MARKETS, Asymmetric; Price; Effects; Competition;, QUANTILE REGRESSION, EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS, NUMBER, DISPERSION, SEARCH, Tankstelle, Niederlande, Unvollkommene Information, AIRLINE INDUSTRY, number of firms and price distribution, gasoline prices, imperfect information, number of firms and price distribution, ddc:330, Benzin, imperfect information, MODEL, DIFFERENTATION, J1, distribution of price information; number of competitors; price dispersion, jel: jel:D83, jel: jel:D43, jel: jel:J1, jel: jel:L13
Preiswettbewerb, SELLERS, gasoline prices, Preis, RETAIL GASOLINE MARKETS, Asymmetric; Price; Effects; Competition;, QUANTILE REGRESSION, EMPIRICAL-ANALYSIS, NUMBER, DISPERSION, SEARCH, Tankstelle, Niederlande, Unvollkommene Information, AIRLINE INDUSTRY, number of firms and price distribution, gasoline prices, imperfect information, number of firms and price distribution, ddc:330, Benzin, imperfect information, MODEL, DIFFERENTATION, J1, distribution of price information; number of competitors; price dispersion, jel: jel:D83, jel: jel:D43, jel: jel:J1, jel: jel:L13
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 31 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
