
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1355428
handle: 10419/35579
Labour market policies settled at national level imply a one-size-fits-all labour market strategy. This strategy might not sufficiently take into account region-specific economic structures. In this paper we employ a panel factor-augmented vector autoregression (FAVAR) to evaluate whether active labour market programs (ALMPs) might asymmetrically affect labour markets at regional level. Given the significant difference between Italian regional economies we separately analyse two areas: the Centre-North and the South. Our results suggest that the timing and magnitude of the reaction of employment rate to ALMP shocks in the two areas is substantially different. Moreover, forecast error variance decomposition highlight that different variables seem to drive employment dynamics. In the South employment is mainly driven by its own shocks and by social and economic context variables. By contrast, in the northern regions, the employment dynamics is significantly explained by the dynamics of nominal and policy variables such as remunerations and ALMP.
ddc:330, FAVAR, Beschäftigungseffekt, Active Labour Market Policies, FAVAR, Active Labour Market Policies, Italien, Wirkungsanalyse, Arbeitsmarktpolitik, Regionaler Arbeitsmarkt, J64, C33, Regionale Inzidenz, jel: jel:C33, jel: jel:J64
ddc:330, FAVAR, Beschäftigungseffekt, Active Labour Market Policies, FAVAR, Active Labour Market Policies, Italien, Wirkungsanalyse, Arbeitsmarktpolitik, Regionaler Arbeitsmarkt, J64, C33, Regionale Inzidenz, jel: jel:C33, jel: jel:J64
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
