
handle: 10419/64641 , 10419/35551
We investigate the problem of optimal choice of the smoothing parameter (bandwidth) for the regression discontinuity estimator. We focus on estimation by local linear regression, which was shown to be rate optimal (Porter, 2003). Investigation of an expected-squared-error-loss criterion reveals the need for regularization. We propose an optimal, data dependent, bandwidth choice rule. We illustrate the proposed bandwidth choice using data previously analyzed by Lee (2008), as well as in a simulation study based on this data set. The simulations suggest that the proposed rule performs well.
Optimal bandwidth selection, Local Linear Regression, Regression Discontinuity Designs, ddc:330, local linear regression, Schätztheorie, Optimal Bandwidth Selection, Regression, optimal bandwidth selection, local linear regression, regression discontinuity designs, regression discontinuity designs, C14, Simulation, jel: jel:C14
Optimal bandwidth selection, Local Linear Regression, Regression Discontinuity Designs, ddc:330, local linear regression, Schätztheorie, Optimal Bandwidth Selection, Regression, optimal bandwidth selection, local linear regression, regression discontinuity designs, regression discontinuity designs, C14, Simulation, jel: jel:C14
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2K | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 0.01% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 0.1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
