Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
SSRN Electronic Jour...arrow_drop_down
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2009 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

The Effects of the Organizational Structure on Asset Management

Authors: Massimo Massa; Lei Zhang;

The Effects of the Organizational Structure on Asset Management

Abstract

We study how the strategies and performance of an asset management company are affected by its internal organizational structure. Relying on Stein's (2002) theory of organizations, we argue that a more hierarchical structure reduces the incentives to collect "soft" information and to engage in proximity investment. This should lower portfolio concentration, increase managerial herding and reduce performance. We use information on the organizational structure of all the US mutual funds and insurance-managed funds investing in US corporate bonds. We show that more hierarchical structures invest less in firms located close to them and deliver lower performance. An additional layer in the hierarchical structure reduces the average performance by 24 basis points per month. At the same time, more hierarchical structures tend to herd more and to hold less concentrated portfolios. We also find that changes in fund structure quickly find their way into the behavior of fund managers. Overall, the organizational structure affects performance slightly more for mutual funds than insurance-managed funds, while it impacts proximity investment, herding and portfolio concentration more for insurance-managed funds than mutual funds.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!