
handle: 10419/35373 , 10419/45715
We utilize a large-scale randomized social experiment to identify how co-workers affect each other’s effort as measured bywork absence. The experiment altered thework absence incentives for half of recover the treatment status of all workers in more than 3,000 workplaces. We first document that employees in workplaces with a high proportion of treated co-workers increase their own absence level significantly. We then examine the heterogeneity of the treatment effect in order to explore what mechanisms are underlying the peer effect. Although a strong effect of having a high proportion of treated co-workers is found for the non-treatedworkers, no significant effects are found for the treated workers. These results suggest that pure altruistic social preferences can be ruled out as the main motivator for the behavior of a non-negligible proportion of the employees in our sample.
Test, ddc:330, Social interactions; employer emkloyee data; work absence; fairness; reciprocal preferences, Dauer, J24, employer employee data, work absence, fairness, employer emkloyee data, Social interactions, Soziale Norm, C93, Fehlzeit, Krankheit, social interactions, employer employee data, work absence, fairness, reciprocal preferences, C23, reciprocal preferences, Schweden, jel: jel:C93, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:J24
Test, ddc:330, Social interactions; employer emkloyee data; work absence; fairness; reciprocal preferences, Dauer, J24, employer employee data, work absence, fairness, employer emkloyee data, Social interactions, Soziale Norm, C93, Fehlzeit, Krankheit, social interactions, employer employee data, work absence, fairness, reciprocal preferences, C23, reciprocal preferences, Schweden, jel: jel:C93, jel: jel:C23, jel: jel:J24
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 50 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
