Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ SSRN Electronic Jour...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: UnpayWall
SSRN Electronic Journal
Article . 2008 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
EconStor
Article . 2012
License: CC BY NC
Data sources: EconStor
versions View all 7 versions
addClaim

Optimal Insurance with Adverse Selection

Authors: Schlee, Edward; Chade, Hector;

Optimal Insurance with Adverse Selection

Abstract

We solve the principal-agent problem of a monopolist insurer selling to an agent whose riskiness (chance of a loss) is private information, a problem introduced in Stiglitz (1977)'s seminal paper. We prove several properties of optimal menus: the highest type gets full coverage (efficiency at the top), all other types are underinsured (downward distortions elsewhere), the contract is non-negative and there are always gains to trade. The main novelty here is that we prove these basic properties for an arbitrary type distribution using elementary arguments. We also prove a new comparative static result for wealth effects, showing that the principal always prefers an agent facing a larger loss, and a poorer one if the agent's risk aversion decreases with wealth. We then specialize to the case of a continuum of types distributed according to an smooth density. We give sufficient conditions for complete sorting, exclusion, and quantity discounts. Our most surprising result is that, under two mild assumptions-log-concavity of the density and decreasing absolute risk aversion for the agent-the optimal premium is backwards-S shaped in the amount of coverage, first concave, then convex (a shape consistent with global quantity discounts). We contrast our results with the standard monopoly model with private values and quasilinear preferences and with competitive insurance models. We calculate a closed form solution for the CARA case and use it to illustrate these differences. Although we focus on the monopoly insurance problem, our proofs can be adapted to other screening problems with wealth e ffects and common values.

Keywords

empirical tests for adverse selection, ddc:330, monopoly insurance, wealth effects, D82, quantity discounts, Principal-agent model, monopoly insurance, common values, wealth effects, quantity discounts, empirical tests for adverse selection, Principal-agent model, common values, jel: jel:D82

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
hybrid