
For a long while after the explosion of macroeconomics in the 1970s, the field looked like a battlefield. Over time, however, mainly because facts do not go away, a largely shared vision both of fluctuations and of methodology has emerged. Not everything is fine. Like all revolutions, this one has come with the destruction of some knowledge, and it suffers from extremism and herding. None of this is deadly, however. The state of macro is good.
macroeconomics, shocks, propagation mechanisms, fluctuations, Macroeconomics, jel: jel:E50, jel: jel:E0, jel: jel:E2, jel: jel:B41, jel: jel:E3, jel: jel:E10, jel: jel:E4, jel: jel:E00
macroeconomics, shocks, propagation mechanisms, fluctuations, Macroeconomics, jel: jel:E50, jel: jel:E0, jel: jel:E2, jel: jel:B41, jel: jel:E3, jel: jel:E10, jel: jel:E4, jel: jel:E00
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 204 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
