
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1208154
handle: 10419/81391
While the importance of institutions for explaining cross-country income differences is widely recognized, comparatively little is known about the origins of economic institutions. One strand of the literature emphasizes cultural differences while another points at exogenous environmental factors such as mortality and climate. Both are supported by some empirical evidence. I reconcile the two schools of institutional origins by proposing a theory of self-selection of colonists to different geographic destinations. Exogenous characteristics such as climate, mortality and factor differences determine which type of settler decides to move to a particular colony. Settler type, in turn, shapes the institutional quality of the new country. The model is used to confirm observed regularities reported by previous researchers. Furthermore, robust new evidence is presented in support of this selection process. The results suggest that any theory of colonial development that does not take selection into account will be incomplete.
N10, Wirtschaftswachstum, O11, O12, ddc:330, Institutionelle Infrastruktur, Culture, P16, Regionale Disparität, Kolonialismus, Origins of Political Institutions, Economic Development; Culture; Origins of Political Institutions, Entwicklungsländer, Economic Development, jel: jel:N10, jel: jel:O12, jel: jel:O11, jel: jel:P16
N10, Wirtschaftswachstum, O11, O12, ddc:330, Institutionelle Infrastruktur, Culture, P16, Regionale Disparität, Kolonialismus, Origins of Political Institutions, Economic Development; Culture; Origins of Political Institutions, Entwicklungsländer, Economic Development, jel: jel:N10, jel: jel:O12, jel: jel:O11, jel: jel:P16
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
