
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1154664
Where the project is financed by debt and equity and the internal rate of return of the project is computed for a period extending beyond the amortization period of the debt, accepting the project based on the conventional method of computing the WACC using first year weights, is incorrect. Besides the fact that such a computation pre-supposes default, as the leverage is dynamic and tends to undergo changes over years, first year weights are not appropriate to make a right decision. Acceptance of projects based on such comparison will leave the investors "worse off" than before. This article recommends computation of WACC based on changing weights and proves how the conventional method is faulty.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
