
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1143309
handle: 10230/11715 , 10230/805
We analyze a standard environment of adverse selection in credit markets. In our environment,entrepreneurs who are privately informed about the quality of their projects need toborrow from banks. Conventional wisdom says that, in this class of economies, the competitiveequilibrium is typically inefficient.We show that this conventional wisdom rests on one implicit assumption: entrepreneurscan only borrow from banks. If an additional market is added to provide entrepreneurs withadditional funds, efficiency can be attained in equilibrium. An important characteristic of thisadditional market is that it must be non-exclusive, in the sense that entrepreneurs must be ableto simultaneously borrow from many different lenders operating in it. This makes it possible toattain efficiency by pooling all entrepreneurs in the new market while separating them in themarket for bank loans.
adverse selection, screening, collateral, Adverse Selection, Credit Markets, Collateral, Screening, Adverse Selection, Credit Markets, Collateral, Monitored Lending, Screening, Adverse Selection; Collateral; Credit Markets; Monitored Lending; Screening, credit markets, monitored lending, adverse selection, Credit Markets, collateral, Monitored Lending, Screening, Macroeconomics and International Economics, jel: jel:D62, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:G20
adverse selection, screening, collateral, Adverse Selection, Credit Markets, Collateral, Screening, Adverse Selection, Credit Markets, Collateral, Monitored Lending, Screening, Adverse Selection; Collateral; Credit Markets; Monitored Lending; Screening, credit markets, monitored lending, adverse selection, Credit Markets, collateral, Monitored Lending, Screening, Macroeconomics and International Economics, jel: jel:D62, jel: jel:D82, jel: jel:G20
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
