
This note reconsiders a theoretical result asserted to explain the success of group lending programs in LDCs. It has been claimed that if groups are allowed to form themselves, risky and safe borrowers will sort themselves into relatively homogenous groups. This positive assortative matching can be exploited by lenders to solve an adverse selection problem that would otherwise undermine the effectiveness of such lending programs. This note shows that the positive assortative matching result does not necessarily hold if earlier models are extended to incorporate dynamic incentives.
microfinance, microcredit, group lending, adverse selection, assortative matching
microfinance, microcredit, group lending, adverse selection, assortative matching
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
