
handle: 10419/26181
Abstract The fiscal decentralization impulse now sweeping the world often leads to partial decentralization, where subnational governments are funded by central transfers, rather than leading to full local autonomy. Despite the practical important of this arrangement, the literature contains no economic analysis of a partial decentralization regime in a Tiebout-style model. This paper provides such an analysis, relying on the key assumption that public-good provision requires effort on the part of government officials. By choosing different degrees of effort, localities can then provide different public-good levels even when a fixed, common transfer constrains them to spend the same amount. A number of useful results are derived.
ddc:330, Öffentliches Gut, Fiskalische Dezentralisierung, Institutioneller Wettbewerb, H1, Decentralization; Tiebout, H7, Theorie, jel: jel:H70, jel: jel:H10, jel: jel:H0, jel: jel:H7
ddc:330, Öffentliches Gut, Fiskalische Dezentralisierung, Institutioneller Wettbewerb, H1, Decentralization; Tiebout, H7, Theorie, jel: jel:H70, jel: jel:H10, jel: jel:H0, jel: jel:H7
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 54 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
