
handle: 10230/473 , 10419/153286
Many factors inhibiting and facilitating economic growth have been suggested. Can agnostics rely on international income data to tell them which matter? We find that agnostic priors lead to conclusions that are sensitive to differences across available income estimates. For example, the PWT 6.2 revision of the 1960–1996 income estimates in the PWT 6.1 leads to substantial changes regarding the role of government, international trade, demography, and geography. We conclude that margins of error in international income estimates appear too large for agnostic growth empirics. (JEL O41, O47)
robust growth determinants, agnostic bayesian econometrics, O47, Statistik, Growth regressions, robust growth determinants, Growth regressions, Macroeconomics and International Economics, Growth regressions, robust growth determinants, agnostic Bayesian econometrics, Internationale Wirtschaft, Wirtschaftswachstum, ddc:330, Datenqualität, Bayes-Statistik, growth regressions, growth regressions; robust growth determinants, E01, Vergleich, Einkommen, agnostic Bayesian econometrics,robust growth determinants,growth regressions, Theorie, jel: jel:E01, jel: jel:O41, jel: jel:O47
robust growth determinants, agnostic bayesian econometrics, O47, Statistik, Growth regressions, robust growth determinants, Growth regressions, Macroeconomics and International Economics, Growth regressions, robust growth determinants, agnostic Bayesian econometrics, Internationale Wirtschaft, Wirtschaftswachstum, ddc:330, Datenqualität, Bayes-Statistik, growth regressions, growth regressions; robust growth determinants, E01, Vergleich, Einkommen, agnostic Bayesian econometrics,robust growth determinants,growth regressions, Theorie, jel: jel:E01, jel: jel:O41, jel: jel:O47
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 127 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
