
handle: 10419/84238
Political budget cycles (PBCs) arise when the electorate is imperfectly informed about the incumbent's competence and the incumbent has discretion over the budget. Focusing on the second condition, we study how separation of powers affects PBCs in the composition of government spending. We find that the details of the budget process, namely, the bargaining rules, the status quo's location, and the degree of compliance with the budget law, are critical for the existence and the amplitudes of PBCs. In particular, when the status quo is determined by the previous budget and there is high compliance with the budget law, separation of powers acts as a commitment device which solves the credibility problems that drive PBCs. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
separation of powers, budgetary process, Concentration of powers, ddc:330, Budget process, checks and balances, Separation of powers, D72, Time consistency, budget composition, Checks and balances, Politischer Konjunkturzyklus, Öffentlicher Haushalt, D78, rational political budget cycles, Political budget cycles, Theorie, Rational political budget cycles; budget composition; separation of powers; checks and balances; budgetary process., jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:D78
separation of powers, budgetary process, Concentration of powers, ddc:330, Budget process, checks and balances, Separation of powers, D72, Time consistency, budget composition, Checks and balances, Politischer Konjunkturzyklus, Öffentlicher Haushalt, D78, rational political budget cycles, Political budget cycles, Theorie, Rational political budget cycles; budget composition; separation of powers; checks and balances; budgetary process., jel: jel:D72, jel: jel:D78
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
