
This paper documents significant associations between the disclosure ratings by analysts (produced by the Association of Investment Management and Research) and publicly accessible and quantifiable disclosure characteristics. These characteristics include disclosure quantity and disclosure timeliness. Results show that firms with longer Business and MD&A sections in annual reports, and firms that file timely reports, receive higher annual report scores. These results are robust after controlling for factors that may affect unobservable disclosure quality such as firm fundamentals, earnings attributes, and company popularity among analysts. Based on the observed association, this paper further attempts to predict the AIMR ratings using quantifiable disclosure data. At a reasonable accuracy rate, the quantity-based predictions reach conclusions consistent with the AIMR scores. This highlights the plausibility of using quantitative disclosure attributes as an efficient indicator of disclosure quality on a large scale.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
