
doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1001886
handle: 10230/1241
A skill-biased change in technology can account at once for the changes observed in a number of important variables of the US labour market between 1970 and 1990. These include the increasing inequality in wages, both between and within education groups, and the increase in unemployment at all levels of education. In contrast, in previous literature this type of technology shock cannot account for all of these changes. The paper uses a matching model with a segmented labour market, an imperfect correlation between individual ability and education, and a fixed cost of setting up a job. The endogenous increase in overeducation is key to understand the response of unemployment to the technology shock.
sbtc, unemployment, overeducation, Overeducation, 330, wage premium, Labour, Public, Development and Health Economics, Unemployment, wage premium, overeducation, SBTC, Unemployment, unemployment, wage premium, overeducation, SBTC, Wage premium, SBTC, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:J64, jel: jel:E24
sbtc, unemployment, overeducation, Overeducation, 330, wage premium, Labour, Public, Development and Health Economics, Unemployment, wage premium, overeducation, SBTC, Unemployment, unemployment, wage premium, overeducation, SBTC, Wage premium, SBTC, jel: jel:J31, jel: jel:J64, jel: jel:E24
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
