
handle: 20.500.14243/45127
This chapter provides an introduction to the crystal structure, crystal chemistry and chemical composition of the amphiboles. It is not an exhaustive treatment; it is intended as an introduction to the material discussed in the following chapters. More extensive discussion of many points is given in Hawthorne (1981, 1983a), although all later developments are discussed in some detail here. Published crystal-structure refinements are listed in Appendix I. The general chemical formula of the amphiboles can be written as \batchmode \documentclass[fleqn,10pt,legalpaper]{article} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amsmath} \pagestyle{empty} \begin{document} \[A\ B\_{2}\ C\_{5}\ T\_{8}\ O\_{22}\ W_{2}\] \end{document} where Minor elements such as Zn, Ni2+, Co2+, V3+, Sc, Cr3+ and Zr are also observed as C cations. In a mineral group as chemically complicated as the amphiboles, there are many problems connected with (1) the measurement of chemical composition, and (2) calculation of the chemical formula. ### Chemical composition The chemical composition of an amphibole is most commonly produced by electron microprobe analysis (EMPA). Instrumentation is very reliable and data reduction (including matrix corrections) are accurate. The main source of error is almost certainly errors in standards, a problem that can be dealt with in a simple but tedious fashion by cross-analyzing all standards. A more serious problem involves the components that cannot be analyzed (or analyzed accurately) by EMPA. Of particular relevance with regard to amphiboles are FeO vs. Fe2O3, Li2O and H2O, all of which occur commonly as highly variable constituents in amphiboles. We will focus on microbeam methods of …
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 84 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
