Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Structural study of the coherent dehydration of wadsleyite

Authors: Y. Ye; J. R. Smyth; D. J. Frost;

Structural study of the coherent dehydration of wadsleyite

Abstract

The coherent dehydration of pure-Mg wadsleyite has been investigated by single-crystal X-ray diffraction at high temperature and room pressure. Hydrous wadsleyite with 2.8 wt% H2O has monoclinic unit-cell parameters of a = 5.6693(4), b = 11.571(1), c = 8.2407(5) A, β = 90.209(3)°, and V = 540.59(7) A3. Dehydration begins at 635 K with an abrupt increase in the a -axis and decrease in b . After dehydration is complete, the dehydrated sample is orthorhombic with a = 5.6995(3), b = 11.4589(8), c = 8.2556(5) A, and V = 539.17(6) A3 at ambient conditions. Atom position and displacement parameters have been refined for both hydrous and dehydrated wadsleyite samples from intensity measurements conducted at high temperatures. The most significant changes during dehydration are systematic decreases in M2–O1 and M3–O1 bond lengths. After dehydration, M2–O1 and M3–O1 bonds decrease by 3% and 2.5%, respectively. While the length changes of the other M–O bonds are no more than 1%, consistent with the hydration mechanism being protonation of O1. For the monoclinic structure, the average thermal expansion coefficient is 38.4(3) × 10−6 K−1 before dehydration and 28.1(8) × 10−6 K−1 for the dehydrated sample. The volumetric thermal expansion coefficients for MgO6 octahedra in the hydrous sample, α( V ), are 36(4), 41(4), 49(5), and 35(4) (10−6 K−1) for M1, M2, M3A, and M3B, respectively. In the dehydrated sample, they are 35(5), 34(4), and 36(2) (10−6 K−1) for M1, M2, and M3, respectively. No significant thermal expansion is observed for SiO4 tetrahedra of either the hydrous or dehydrated sample.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!