Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Jahrbuch Dokumentarische Methode. Heft 1/2019

Authors: Amling, Steffen; Geimer, Alexander; Schondelmayer, Anne; Stützel, Kevin; Thomsen, Sarah;

Jahrbuch Dokumentarische Methode. Heft 1/2019

Abstract

Steffen Amling, Alexander Geimer, Anne Schondelmayer, Sarah Thomsen, Kevin Stützel: Editorial: Neue Perspektiven der Dokumentarischen Methode; Ralf Bohnsack, Iris Nentwig-Gesemann, Nora Hoffmann: Typenbildung und Dokumentarische Methode; Arnd-Michael Nohl: Zur Bedeutung der relationalen Typenbildung für die Dokumentarische Methode. Offene Beiträge und Repliken: Martin Hunold: Zur dokumentarischen Rekonstruktion von Organisationserziehung; Steffen Amling: Differenzierung von Typen von Organisationen in der Dokumentarischen Methode. Eine Replik zum Beitrag von Martin Hunold; Daniel Goldmann: Ist das noch Dokumentarisch? Replik zu einer Variante Dokumentarischer Organisationsforschung; Denise Klinge: Dokumentarische Methode und digitale Artefakte - Zur Rekonstruktion der Vermittlungsweisen von Apps; Martin Karcher: Einige Herausforderungen für erziehungswissenschaftliche Forschung durch Digitalisierung. Eine Replik zum Beitrag von Denise Klinge; Anna Rauschenberg: Das Adressierungs- und Re-Adressierungsgeschehen der sozialen Interaktionspraxis Interview - Überlegungen zu einem blinden Fleck der Dokumentarischen Methode; Jan-Hendrik Hinzke: Reflexivität in der Dokumentarischen Methode - metatheoretische Herausforderungen. Eine Replik zum Beitrag von Anna Rauschenberg; Philip Schelling: Zur Organisation von Partei - Über die Verordnung von Gemeinschaft und die asymmetrische Herstellung von Konsens; Alexander Geimer: Hörige Angehörigkeit / appellative Konjunktivität als Meta-Identität / Subjektnorm? Eine Replik zum Beitrag von Philip Schelling.

Keywords

10104 Research Design, method, methodology, research approach, typology, organization theory

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!