Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Regulation of Mammary Progenitor Cells by p53 and Parity

Authors: D. J. Jerry; Luwei Tao;

Regulation of Mammary Progenitor Cells by p53 and Parity

Abstract

Abstract : Breast cancer is the most frequent cancer among women in the United States. A full term pregnancy early in reproductive life can reduce breast cancer incidence in women by up to 50% and p53, an important tumor suppressor gene, was shown to be a major effector for this protection effect. We hypothesized that p53 may negatively regulate the proliferation and self-renewal of mammary stem/progenitor cells and that the increased p53 in parous gland may limit mammary stem/progenitor cells population and reduce the transformation risk. Mammosphere assays showed that decreased p53 dosage in Trp53+/- and Trp53-/- mice led to increased numbers and size of mammospheres. Meanwhile, the number of secondary and tertiary mammospheres was not affected by (IR) regardless of their genotype. The cell cycle analysis also showed that the Trp53-/- mammospheres have higher proliferation rate than Trp53+/+ spheres. Serial dilution and transplantation experiments also showed that the Trp53-/- epithelium had significantly increased frequency of long-term regenerative MaSCs compared to Trp53+/+ epithelium. The BrdU labeling experiment showed that Trp53-/- mammary gland contains less label-retaining epithelial cells (LRECs) than Trp53+/+ epithelium. Our data suggest that p53 negatively regulates the self-renewal of mammary stem cells. The MaSCs pool expands with decreased p53 dosage, which may result in a higher transformation risk. Meanwhile, the p53-mediated apoptosis pathway is compromised in the mammosphere-initiating cells.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Cancer Research
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!