Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ https://figshare.com...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
https://figshare.com/articles/...
Report
License: CC BY
Data sources: UnpayWall
https://dx.doi.org/10.1184/r1/...
Other literature type . 2006
Data sources: Datacite
https://dx.doi.org/10.1184/r1/...
Other literature type . 2006
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 4 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Toward Measures for Software Architectures

Authors: Gary J. Chastek; Robert Ferguson;

Toward Measures for Software Architectures

Abstract

This technical note describes the results of a preliminary investigation into measures for software architecture. It focuses on measures that directly indicate the health of or detect a problem with the software architecture of an up-and-running software system. Defining these architectural measures is very difficult. The software architecture deeply affects the subsequent development and project management decisions, such as the breakdown of the coding tasks and the definition of the development increments. Most existing measures for up-and-running software systems capture the cumulative results of architectural, developmental, and managerial decisions and do not directly address the health of the software architecture. The investigation into measures requires the joint participation of the software architecture and measurement communities. Since the software architecture community has made such rapid progress over the past ten years, this report first describes what the measurement community needs to know about software architecture to understand the difficulty of defining architectural measures. The current relevant literature is then described in terms of its potential contribution to this research. Finally, the report identifies areas for future research into the application of measurement technology to software architectures. The ultimate goal of this body of work is to provide measurement guidance and quantitative decision support to software practitioners, including software architects and project managers.

Keywords

FOS: Computer and information sciences, 80309 Software Engineering

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Average
Top 10%
Average