
doi: 10.21236/ada335629
Abstract : A two-phase study was conducted to determine the efficacy of MIL-STD-662E in ballistic protection limit determination for advanced lightweight armor technologies. The first-phase results demonstrated an unacceptable variability in limit estimates across sites. It was concluded that more stringent controls in implementing MIL-STD-662E, particularly as to test velocity selection, would be required to achieve adequate reproducibility. An unusual pattern in the data from the first phase suggested that there was a physical reason beyond operational concerns for the unacceptable variability. In the second phase, this new reason was investigated in an interlaboratory test involving six sites. It was determined that a physical phenomenon, termed shatter gap, was the principal cause of the irreproducible results from the first phase. For this setting, modifications of MIL-STD-662E to support reproducible results were suggested and successfully tested.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
