Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Working Memory Capacity: An Individual Differences Approach

Authors: Randall W. Engle;

Working Memory Capacity: An Individual Differences Approach

Abstract

Abstract : Five experiments are described that study the relationship between measures of working memory and reading comprehension. Two experiments investigated whether the complex span measure must be similar to the reading comprehension task to be predictive of comprehension. The correlation found between reading comprehension and two reading-related complex spans was similar to those found between two arithmetic-related complex spans and comprehension. The relationship remained significant when quantitative skills were factored out. The simple digit and word spans (measured without a background task) did NOT correlate with reading comprehension. The complex span/comprehension correlations were a function of the difficulty of the background task. When the difficulty level of the reading-related or arithmetic-related background tasks was moderate, the span/comprehension correlations were higher in magnitude than when the background tasks were simple or very difficult. The third experiment showed that if serial recall was required in the span tasks, simple word span did significantly predict reading comprehension but not as well as the sentence span. The fourth experiment showed that the ordering of list lengths in the span tasks had little influence on the correlation between span scores and comprehension. The fifth experiment is the first in a series investigating variables whether variables that influence simple word span also influence the sentence word span. This study demonstrated that the word length has the same effect on the sentence span task as on the simple word span.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!