Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Electromagnetic Wave Scattering from Rough Terrain

Authors: Richard L. Taylor; John F. Lennon; Robert J. Papa;

Electromagnetic Wave Scattering from Rough Terrain

Abstract

Abstract : This report presents two aspects of a program designed to calculate electromagnetic scattering from rough terrain: (1) the use of statistical estimation techniques to determine topographic parameters and (2) the results of a single-roughness-scale scattering calculation based on those parameters, including comparison with experimental data. In the statistical part of the present calculation, digitized topographic maps are used to generate data bases for the required scattering cells. The application of estimation theory to the data leads to the specification of statistical parameters for each cell. The estimated parameters are then used in a hypothesis test to decide on a probability density function (PDF) that represents the height distribution in the cell. Initially, the formulation uses a single observation of the multivariate data. A subsequent approach involves multiple observations of the heights on a bivariate basis, and further refinements are being considered. The electromagnetic scattering analysis, the second topic, calculates the amount of specular and diffuse multipath power reaching a monopulse receiver from a pulsed beacon positioned over a rough earth. The program allows for spatial inhomogeneities and multiple specular reflection points. The analysis of shadowing by the rough surface has been extended to the case where the surface heights are distributed exponentially. The calculated loss of boresight pointing accuracy attributable to diffuse multipath is then compared with the experimental results. The extent of the specular region, the use of localized height variations, and the effect of the azimuthal variation in power pattern are all assessed.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!