Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Geoid Heights, Geoid Height Differences, and Mean Gravity Anomalies from 'Low-Low' Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking - An Error Analysis,

Authors: Rummel, R. (Reiner), 1945-;

Geoid Heights, Geoid Height Differences, and Mean Gravity Anomalies from 'Low-Low' Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking - An Error Analysis,

Abstract

Abstract : The mathematical model for a simultaneous estimation of improved orbital parameters and an approximation of the earth's gravity field from range rate observations in an SST 'low-low' experiment is described. In a somewhat simplified model an error analysis for the estimation of geoid heights, geoid height differences 1 deg x 1 deg mean gravity anomalies is performed employing the least squares collocation method. Investigated is the dependence of the estimated parameters upon the measurement precision, the spatial configuration of the two satellites, the intersatellite distance, and the experiment altitude. In an optimal situation - assuming a range rate precision of + or - ten to the minus 6th power/ms, an intersatellite distance of 250 km, and an experiment altitude of 200 km - the estimated a posteriori std. dev. are + or - 0.9 m for point geoid heights, + or - 0.7 m for geoid height differences (point separation 150 km), and + or - 6 to 7 mgal for 1 deg x 1 deg mean gravity anomalies. These numbers compare very well with the results obtained from GEOS-3 altimetry for the seasurface topography. Unmodelled short-wavelength uncertainties in the orbit have thereby to be controlled down to 1 cm in radial direction, whereas the requirements for the control of long-wavelength error effects are moderate. (Author)

Country
United States
Related Organizations
Keywords

620

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Average
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!