Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Using Assertions for Adaptive Testing of Software.

Authors: Dorothy M. Andrews;

Using Assertions for Adaptive Testing of Software.

Abstract

Abstract : One way of assuring greater reliability of software is to improve testing techniques. Three of the key problems associated with software testing are: choosing adequate test cases, assuring correctness of results, and reducing the high cost of testing. By combining the capability of adaptive testing with use of executable assertions, it is possible to execute a program automatically with a large number of test cases over a wide range of input values. The usual goal of adaptive testing is to maximize some performance value (objective function) for the software by automated perturbation of the input parameters in such a way as to degrade the system performance to a specified limit but this technique only indirectly leads to locating errors. In software testing, the primary goal is to locate the maximum number of errors. Since software errors can be detected by executable assertions, these assertions can be used to define an objective function for the adaptive tester so that a program can be tested automatically and a mapping made of its 'error space'. A search algorithm is used to generate new test cases based on past performance data about the number of assertion violations. Software testing can become much more efficient and effective through use of adaptive testing with assertions because such extensive testing increases the possibility of finding any existing errors and of improving software reliability.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!