
doi: 10.2118/89735-ms
Abstract Clean sands have null or minimal shale and clay, and can adequately be evaluated using petrophysical techniques like neutron-density cross-plot and Archie's equation. Routine core analysis can be enough for validating log-analysis results in clean sands. On the other hand, shaly sands have considerable shale and clay; consequently the above petrophysical evaluation techniques are not adequate. Porosity logs, e.g. neutron, density and sonic, and saturation logs, i.e. deep-resistivity, are affected by the shale and clay present in shaly sands. Additionally, shale and clay affect the electrical properties, the capillary pressure and the transmissibility in shaly sands. The effects of shale and clay, on logs and log-analysis, need to be modeled and incorporated in the petrophysical evaluation in order to obtain a more accurate assessment of shaly sands. Soft and hard data was acquired in some shaly sands, in Saudi Arabia, to evaluate their storage and flow capacity. Density, neutron, sonic, resistivity and gamma-ray logs were routinely acquired in wells drilled in these formations. Logs like Elemental-Capture-Spectroscopy (ECS) and Nuclear-Magnetic-Resonance (NMR) were acquired in key wells. In some key wells, the core was cut and core analysis was conducted to obtain formation porosity, electrical properties and clay attributes, e.g. clay-type and clay-abundance. The above data was exploited in improving shaly sands petrophysical evaluation, which is discussed and demonstrated in this paper.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
