
doi: 10.2118/77528-ms , 10.2523/77528-ms
Abstract In the past, junction construction technology has driven the design of multilateral wells. This practice has led to technical successes that may or may not have met all of the operator's desired well objectives. These projects have often been regarded as less than successful from an economic point of view. This regard is partly due to the way that junction construction has been viewed. Junctions are presently classified by looking at the technical differences in how they are constructed, such as TAML levels (Technology Advancement – Multi Laterals)1. Although this method is suitable for looking at junction construction complexity, it does not address directly what the junction does in service. Another approach would be to drive the design using information about reservoir/production requirements. Looking at functional groups of junction features will allow the drilling or completions engineer to make sense of the myriad of available junction systems. This technique can help optimize the multilateral junction type selection for a given project. The process of planning multilateral projects from conception through well design will be discussed with a focus on using a functional classification map to clarify the junction requirements. The Functional Classification Method will assist engineers in comparing equipment options. This comparison is accomplished by, first, defining the reservoir and economic drivers, and, then, by selecting the appropriate junction attributes. Furthermore, the method will provide a process for assembling the data required to prepare the final well design and to prepare precise tender documents. To illustrate this method, recent examples from the Middle East will be presented.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
