Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Clay Stabilization Improves Sand Control

Authors: J.R. Tague; S. Lewallen;

Clay Stabilization Improves Sand Control

Abstract

Abstract In a recent study, Chevron tested the capability of clay stabilizers to improve sand control in the Coalinga field. The need for improved sand control was driven by the high frequency of pump failures and associated increase in operating expense (OPEX). Before the clay stabilization treatments, most sand control efforts were focused on improving pump design and the continual replacement of old or worn-out slotted liners (re-drills). In a desire to improve overall returns and to reduce OPEX, a study was launched to determine the primary causes of sand entry and to improve overall sand control through clay stabilization. The study initially gathered and analyzed data on the formation including sieve analysis, mineralogical analysis, and SEM microphotographs. Mineralogical analysis and SEM photographs obtained from core samples showed the grains to be weakly cemented by a combination of smectite and illite clays. Based on this data, a hypothesis was developed stating that wellbore sand entry was preceded by the release of the cementing clays, and thus by corollary, sand control could be improved by preventing the migration and release of the binding clays. To test this hypothesis, multiple wells were treated with a clay stabilizer designed to strengthen the chemical bond of the clays. To date, 22 wells have been treated for sand control, with 14 qualified successes. Based on these results, a standard treatment procedure has been designed, and candidate selection criteria developed. Overall, clay stabilization appears to be a quick and inexpensive method for improving sand control, especially when combined with more traditional methods.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    4
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
4
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!