Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Development of an Improved Waterflood Optimization Program in the Northeast Savonburg Waterflood

Authors: L.G. Schoeling; G.B. Barnett; M.J. Michnick; A.W. Walton; D.W. Green; G.P. Willhite;

Development of an Improved Waterflood Optimization Program in the Northeast Savonburg Waterflood

Abstract

Abstract The Savonburg Field, a shallow reservoir located in southeastern Kansas, has production problems which are common in fluvial dominated deltaic reservoirs and other areas of the country where stripper-well production is important. The problems relate to poor waterflood sweep and lack of an integrated reservoir management program. The poor water-flood sweep efficiency is due to (1) reservoir heterogeneity, (2) channeling of injected water through high permeability zones or fractures, and (3) clogging of water injection wells with solids as a result of poor water quality. Reservoir management suffers from the lack of (1) sufficient data collection and organization, (2) integrated analysis of existing data by geological and engineering personnel, and (3) identification of optimum recovery techniques. A project to increase oil recovery from the Savonburg Field is being conducted under the DOE Class 1 Program. The objective is to improve waterflooding through integrated reservoir management. To date, two technologies have demonstrated positive economics. An air flotation unit has demonstrated that the poor water quality can be improved economically with reduced costs compared to previous operations. Permeability modification treatments plugged channels and increased oil recovery. Earlier treatments yielded five barrels of incremental oil per pound of polymer injected and recent treatments have improved injection profiles. Reservoir characterization studies identified unswept oil in the lower B3 zone and as a result two waterflooding patterns were modified and a new injection well was drilled. Incremental oil is expected to result from this change.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!