Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Coupling Model of DFM and EDFM for Unconventional Reservoir Simulation Under Complex Geological Conditions

Authors: Jiapeng Han; Zhiming Chen; Xinwei Liao; Zekai Tang; Jun Zhang;

Coupling Model of DFM and EDFM for Unconventional Reservoir Simulation Under Complex Geological Conditions

Abstract

Abstract Safe, economic development of subsurface hydrocarbon resources, as well as emerging hydrogen or CO2 storage projects, relies on accurate characterization of reservoir fractures and faults. The discrete fracture model (DFM) captures low-conductivity barrier faults with high fidelity but becomes computationally expensive for many highly conductive fractures, whereas the embedded discrete fracture model (EDFM) is efficient for conductive fractures yet struggles with low-conductivity features. To reconcile these limitations, this work introduces a tetrahedral grid hybrid model in which DFM is applied during preprocessing to honor low-conductivity faults, and EDFM is applied during post-processing to efficiently model high-conductivity fractures. Governing equations are discretized with a finite volume method, and interfacial fluxes are evaluated using the two-point flux approximation (TPFA), maintaining accuracy while improving runtime. Benchmark comparison against projection-based EDFM (pEDFM) confirms that the hybrid scheme reproduces low-conductivity behavior with equal accuracy. A field-scale case that contains 500 natural fractures, 2 faults, and a multistage fractured horizontal well further shows that the different pressure and water saturation near the low permeability fault. These results demonstrate that the proposed method simultaneously captures the coupled influence of high conductivity fractures and low conductivity faults on multiphase flow, providing an efficient and robust tool for complex reservoir simulation.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!