Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

On-the-Fly Proppant Flowback Control Additive

Authors: Charles Zha; John Green; Benjamin Abrams; Logan Cabori; Kevin Hamori; Adam Harper;

On-the-Fly Proppant Flowback Control Additive

Abstract

Abstract This paper covers the research, development, and field application of a cost-effective, on-the-fly chemical additive that reduces proppant flowback during well production. Laboratory tests and field results, showing the effect this chemical additive has on proppant flowback, are examined. Previous proppant flowback prevention methods are reviewed. Laboratory tests that were performed to ensure effective on-the-fly coating in the blender tub, as well as the ability to control proppant flowback, are also analyzed. A review of fracturing treatments performed in wells utilizing the proppant flowback control additive (PFCA) is provided. Post-fracture treatment proppant flowback and production results are compared to direct offset wells using conventional proppants. Fracturing treatment designs, formation characteristics, and proppant types are presented. Laboratory proppant flow tests show PFCA-treated proppant can withstand a much higher critical flow rate than uncoated fracturing sand. Unconfined compressive strength tests indicate that proppant is coated efficiently in the blender tub, enabling effective consolidation at downhole conditions. The results of laboratory tests are used to explain and support the field case studies. The field case studies show that use of PFCA significantly reduces proppant flowback and typically results in higher hydrocarbon production when compared to conventional proppants used in offset wells. With completion designs moving to finer mesh size proppant and higher proppant loadings per lateral foot, operators are increasing spending to deal with higher amounts of proppant flowback. This paper introduces an important technology that is an economically viable and beneficial substitute for traditional proppant flowback prevention methods.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!