Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Compaction Seismicity: What Determines Seismic vs. Non-Seismic Behavior in Dutch Gas Fields?

Authors: C. J. de Pater; Cas Berentsen; Hans Martens;

Compaction Seismicity: What Determines Seismic vs. Non-Seismic Behavior in Dutch Gas Fields?

Abstract

Abstract Reservoir compaction in depleting gas fields can cause seismicity, as has been observed in a dozen countries (Foulger et al., 2019). So, it is no surprise that some of the Dutch gas fields induce many earthquakes up to magnitude 3.5. Remarkably, the occurrence of Dutch seismicity is strongly clustered in two regions, while most fields induce no recorded seismicity at all. It has been attempted to explain this from differences in reservoir characteristics, but as yet, no reservoir property has been found that can explain the difference in seismicity. A new mechanism is proposed that can explain the regional variation of seismicity. For a few gas reservoirs, the evolution of potential fault slippage is simulated using the commonly adopted Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. This shows that fault criticality is expected for reservoirs that showed seismic as well as non-seismic behavior. Apparently, some characteristic property is missing to explain the difference in behavior. Using published pressure histories for seismically active gas fields, the relation is shown between seismic magnitude and relative depletion. It appears that in many cases, the first induced earthquake is relatively strong which suggests substantial cohesion of the faults. It is plausible from the geological history that in non-seismic regions, fault cohesion is larger, so that slippage is inhibited.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!