Abstract Multilaterals are often cited as technology that can be implemented to maximize reservoir recovery rates. However, few operators have been willing to put multilaterals into practice. The most frequently cited reason for not considering multilaterals is risk. This paper presents a study of data from 22 years of actual multilateral well applications that demonstrate the reliability of the technology. For the purpose of this study, failure has been defined as the loss of either the lateral or main bore or the loss of the junction (and therefore access to both legs). In the context of this study, reliability has been defined as the ability to successfully construct and complete the multilateral junction. Where failures have occurred, a study to determine root cause(s) has been undertaken. The records of one multilateral service provider have been analyzed from more than 800 actual multilateral installations to determine success and failure rates. The reliability of multilaterals has been compared to the reliability rates of other wellbore completion and construction technologies. Multilateral technology (MLT), which was first implemented by Alexander Grigoryan in 1953, came into modern practice in the 1990s. Although it is not failure-free, the reliability of multilateral wells has improved remarkably during the past 22 years. This improvement in reliability has occurred as the complexities of multilateral installations have increased. This paper shows that successful completion rates of multilateral junctions have improved from slightly more than 87% for the period of 1995 to 1999 (with more than 100 junctions completed) to slightly more than 98% for the current five-year period (with more than 220 junctions completed). This improvement is the result of continuous planning, development of and adherence to procedures, management of change, communication, and continuous improvement. This is the first known study of multilateral reliability that encompasses a large body of data over a significant time period. The results presented should enable operators to make fact-based decisions about the reliability of MLT and about whether or not this technology should be considered for implementation into resource development plans.